|
|
|
Massachusetts Community College Council |
|
NEWSLETTER |
|
Volume X |
December, 1992 |
Number Five |
In This Issue:
On December 10, 1992, the governor returned to the House and Senate, unsigned, House Bill 6208, our collective bargaining increases. In a further attempt to prevent this bill from passing, the governor raised the legal question regarding the process the legislature followed in proposing and voting on this bill. Specifically he cited the State Ethics Commission warning concerning legislators who may not vote on "special" legislation if they have family members who may benefit from the vote. You may recall that the senate changed the bill from "special" to "general" legislation in order to avoid any conflict of interest.
Though this new threat to prevent state employees from getting a raise is no surprise, the legislature is expected to override the governor's veto. (Bill was overridden in House on December 14, 1992, 88-22.) As this newsletter goes to press, the bill should be law by the time you read this.
It cannot be stressed enough how important it
is to take a few minutes to call or write your representative and
senator and thank them for their support. We must let them know that
we appreciate their taking on the governor and the state's citizens
to pass this bill. A number of legislators have taken a lot of
criticism for their support of the state workers, and that support
must not go unrecognized or unacknowledged.
If anyone is interested in submitting proposed
changes to the MCCC Constitution and Bylaws, they must do so in
writing no later than February 1, 1993. Proposed changes must
be sent to the Constitution and Bylaws chair, Ernest
Therrien.
Over the past few years, some colleges have been moving non-unit employees, mostly administrators, into our bargaining unit jobs without posting the vacancy or following the contract for the filling of these positions. Additionally, when the colleges have moved these non-unit employees into these positions, the employees have carried their salary which is most often higher than the salaries of unit members teaching or working in that work area. The MCCC has a number of pending grievances and arbitrations on this issue. In November the MCCC received a precedent-setting decision from Arbitrator James Cooper concerning the placement of two administrators into our bargaining unit. This personnel action, he ruled, was in violation of the MCCC contract. In 1989 Massasoit Community College assigned the assistant controller the duties of an admissions counselor. Moreover an administrative staff associate was assigned to the position of Director of Testing and Assessment. The chapter grieved these personnel actions by claiming a violation of Article XVI (Filling of Vacancies in the Bargaining Unit). The grievance was denied at Steps I and II and was subsequently certified for arbitration.
During the arbitration, the Union argued that Article XVI requires that vacancies or open positions involving our unit work be posted and filled in accordance with the provisions of the contract. The contract was clearly violated when the college did not post the notice of vacancy, yet filled these two positions.
The college argued that these positions were important jobs to the college and that it could not have filled either position if the employees involved could not "carry" their salaries ($35,191 for Director of Testing and $38,912 for Admissions Counselor) with them since there was no separate funding for these positions. The college argued that Article XVI applies only to "vacancies" and that because there was no "separate and independent funding for the disputed positions" the college had no intention of filling those positions. Therefore, according to the college, there was no "vacancy."
Arbitrator Cooper writes in his decision that, "The issue in this case boils down to whether ... there was 'funding . . . available' and, if so, whether the College 'intended to fill those positions. The 'funding of a position is not some magical circumstance by which someone annoints [sic] 93; a position as 'funded.' Funding simply means that someone is performing the duties assigned to a particular position and is getting paid by the Employer. There is simply no room for any other definition. The college may want to preserve the jobs of each and every employee, but that desire does not mean that the College 'funds' only that employee and the employee owns' those funds. The fact of the matter is that the College has decided that certain work must get done, it has money available to pay for those services and it pays someone to perform that work. When the College pays someone to perform work assigned to a particular job title, it has funds available' [for] that position."
"To define the term 'funding' as the Employer seeks to do in this case completely undermines the collective bargaining agreement. Under the College's theory it could replace all of the faculty with administrators and yet never have a single vacancy for which a posting under Article XVI is required. This would be an absurd result because it would completely wipe out retrenchment rights . . . including recall rights. While the College may claim that under its definition of 'vacancy' there never will be a retrenchment because it will always protect the existing employees, the College simply cannot operate in a vacuum and on the basis of its own system of definitions. The College is party to an agreement which takes a much broader view of its obligations. Thus, using the current case as an example, the College could have laid off [these two] employees ... and posted the bargaining unit positions.... Presumably the posting would have resulted in the application of personnel from throughout the community college system . . . and if there were an applicant who was 'equally best qualified' the applicant who had been retrenched ... would have had the highest priority for the position. While it would certainly have been sad for [these two employees] to be laid off, nevertheless the system would have replaced them with existing bargaining unit employees who were best qualified to do the job and who would otherwise have remained on lay off. The rights of these laid off unit members is precisely what is protected under the terms of the parties' collective bargaining agreement. It is not up to [these two employees] to decide that 'their salary' goes 'with them' and therefore, in effect, they decide whether the positions ... are funded."
"Turning now to the claim that the College had no 'intent' to fill the position[s] because it would not have done so if it meant that [these employees] had to be laid off. In other words, the College's intent was only to fill those positions with existing personnel whose salary the College was already committed to pay. The College's intent cannot be so conditioned. The evidence of intent is dramatically demonstrated by what the College did, not by the President's or the Dean of Administrative Services' own internal thought processes. The College wanted the work of the Director of Testing and Assessment and the Admissions
Counsellor [sic] performed. It assigned personnel to perform those tasks, therefore the College intended to fill those positions."
The arbitrator ruled that the College violated Article X I of the Agreement when it failed to post and fill the vacancies in the positions of Director of Testing and Assessment and Admissions Counsellor.
As a result, the positions of Director of Testing and Assessment and Admissions Counsellor are hereby found to be vacant. The College shall forthwith post and fill those two positions in accordance with Article XVI of the Agreement.
The MCCC has been informed that the College
intends to appeal this decision.
|
All female faculty and professional staff who are part of the equity suit settlement should have received a correspondence from Attorney Betty A. Gittes. A number of letters, however, have been returned, address unknown. In the next couple of issues of the Newsletter, a list will be printed of women who need to be contacted. If you know anyone knows anyone on this list, please contact her and ask her to call Attorney Gittes at 617-951-0233.
Berkshire:
Jacqueline Arnold; Judith Aronow; Kristina Cimini; Anne Gates;
Linda Leeking; Marie Trifone
Bristol:
June F. Manelis; Mychell D. Sneed; Anne Watson; Diana Yarchin,
Estate of
Bunker Hill:
Patricia Brown; Henriette Huybregts; Pamela Perkins-Johnson;
Marjorie S. Langway; Molly Leong
Cape Cod:
Marie Canaves; Magaret Griffith; Thelma Yarborough
Holyoke:
Leslie Butterworth, Estate of; Virginia F. Johnston; Mary-Jane
O'Connor
Massasoit:
Janet Alien; Elizabeth Chisholm; Laureen Fregeau
Mass. Bay:
Ann Marie Clougherty; Sharon H. Dunn; Ann Hilferty; Susan M.
Santucci
Middlesex:
Geraldine Dansky; Lisa Lessard; Kristine Perkins
Mt. Wachustt:
an E. Siskind
No. Essex:
Bonnie Neuhardt
No. Shore:
Marion Ahern, Estate of; Linda Boyer; Judith Gray; Marguerite
Gerstell; Margaret Niles
Quinsigamond:
Ellyn Bulikowski; Diane Gary
Roxbury:
Josephine Apperwhite; Eleanor Burtman; Carol Camlin; Sharon
Phillip; Lourdes Rodriquez; Adrienne Scott
Springfield:
Linda Harrington; Nancy McAuliffe; Susan Warner
The 1993 NEA Higher Education Conference will be held at the Fairmont Hotel near the French Quarter in New Orleans. Though the conference runs from Friday, February 26 to Sunday, February 28, 1993, the National Council for Higher Education will hold its annual meeting beginning on Thursday evening, February 25 and ending at 1 p.m. on February 26.
Everyone should have received a registration
form at home. The registration fee covers the reception and banquet
on Friday, lunch on Saturday, brunch on Sunday, and all materials. If
you register prior to December 18 the fee is $110; after December 18,
the fee is $135. Deadline for registration is January 15,
1993. The hotel rate is $103 per night. If you are interested and
need additional information, call Irma Johnson at NEA at
202-822-7162.
At Northern Essex Community College a DCE unit member, Sister Barbara, was dismissed after a student grievance was filed against her. Not only was she not afforded any due process in this dismissal, the college refused to provide written reasons for the nonreappointment. The college did not provide her an opportunity to respond to the issue nor did it conduct any investigation based on her accounting of the issue. A grievance was filed and when the case reached arbitration, it was resolved. Sister Barbara was paid $6500 and her personnel file was expunged. Any future references will come directly from her personnel file which is very positive. Sister Barbara has resigned and severed her employment with No. Essex and is now teaching at a private college.
At
Mass. Bay Community College another case was settled prior to
arbitration. This case concerned a unit member who had been teaching
from 1974 to 1991 in the psychology and sociology work areas. In 1991
he was not reappointed because the college claimed he did not meet
the seniority pool threshold in the individual work areas. The
union's position is that a unit member meets the threshold with five
courses over three years at the college. This issue was finally
resolved, and the grievant was placed on the seniority list in both
the psychology and sociology work areas. He will be reappointed for
the spring 1993 semester and will receive $1,750 compensation.
Jan. 8
Deadline to apply to run as a
statewide delegate to NEA Representative Assembly from
higher education district. Application in December edition
of MTA Today.
Jan. 15
Deadline to register for NEA Higher
Education Conference in New Orleans February 26-28,
1993.
Feb. 1
Deadline to submit proposed changes to
MCCC Constitution and Bylaws.
Feb. 1
Deadline to apply for full- and
part-time day negotiating team.
Mar. 1
Deadline to apply for DCE negotiating
team.
Mark
Your Calendars for Deadlines
An early retirement bill has been released from the Public Service Committee. In its present form, it is nearly identical to the bill which passed for other state employees last year. The one difference is that this bill allows the institutions to fill all positions vacated through this early retirement bill if the positions are deemed essential and critical and appear on a list submitted to the public service and education committees by the secretary of education. Specifics of the bill are:
There is continued resistance by Administration
and Finance to accept this bill since it is not revenue neutral.
Amendments will be made to how the institutions pay the cost of
retirement and health insurance costs.
Applications are now being accepted for the MCCC Negotiating Team for the 1993-1996 day (full-time and part-time day employees) contract. Anyone interested in applying for the team should include the following information in his or her resume and cover letter:
Applicants should bear in mind that attendance at the Negotiations Track at the MTA Summer Leadership Conference at Williams College, August 9-13, 1993, may be required of all team members.
Applications must be postmarked no later than
February 1, 1993, and mailed to: Tom Parsons, MCCC
President
|
Dec. 18 |
Faculty submit College Service (E4) and Student Advisement (E5) forms |
|
Dec. 23 |
Student evaluation summary to part-time faculty |
|
Dec. 28 |
Teaching assignments to part-time faculty |
|
Dec. 30 |
Professional staff submit College Service (E4) and Student (E5) Advisement forms |
|
Jan. 15 |
First year professional staff E4 and E5 evaluation due |
|
Jan. 15 |
Professional staff work performance evaluation due |
|
Jan. 15 |
Part-time faculty (third year) summary evaluation |
|
Jan. 20 |
Faculty E4 and E5 evaluations due |
|
Jan. 23 |
Student evaluation summary (E6) due to faculty |
|
Editor: MCCC/MTA Newsletter |
The MCCC Newsletter is a publication of the Massachusetts Community College Council. The Newsletter is intended to be an information source for the members of the MCCC and for other interested parties. The material in this publication may be reprinted with the acknowledgment of its source. For further information on issues discussed in this publication, contact Catherine Boudreau, Massasoit Community College, Brockton, MA 02402. |
|
|