![]() |
![]() |
Dr. Timothy E. Trask is Director of the TV/Radio Center at Massasoit Community College, Brockton.
But Leslie seems to forget that the NLF, known by most Americans as "Viet Cong," was comprised of real people involved in a real struggle:
Be it "exquisite" or not, unfortunately, we never really get out of that zone inside Mr. Leslie's head. Much of the rest of the book, it seems, is sprinkled with angst over whether or not he is brave. Nowhere does Leslie bother to define bravery, so it's difficult to figure what he's talking about. To most people, war correspondents are already brave. Who would voluntarily leave a perfectly good free society that has ample opportunities for expression and enter a war zone where life is in frequent peril but someone who is a tad outside the range of normalcy when it comes to bravery? Furthermore, despite the fact that Mr. Jacques was once wounded, he stayed in the war zone and continued to put his person at risk. The Mark is a very personal account of covering Viet Nam and Cambodia in the seventies, right up until both countries were taken over by Communist-led groups.
People who have the "mark" of Mr. Leslie's title seem to be more interested in being where the action is than in the people going through the struggles on either side. War correspondents, as Mr. Leslie presents them, do not seem to agonize over right and wrong or any other philosophical or political issues so much as they try to get at some "truth" behind official pronouncements coming from both sides. In addition, journalists have their own battles waging behind the scenes: who will land a front-page placement? what paper will be the first to report this or that aspect of the war? when will a commander slip and reveal an inconsistency? where will the next significant event take place? why wasn't this brilliant journalistic coup worthy of a Pulitzer?
I found the book to be fascinating, despite being at times annoyed
by some of Mr. Leslie's personal revelations, and found that the
material was forthrightly presented, making this account seem
trustworthy on other, more important observations regarding the
business of reporting these wars. The Mark is a worthwhile addition
to studies of journalism in the seventies.
|
SPRING 1997
|